The Trump Administration Nears Open Defiance of the Courts | The New Yorker

See original article

Key Events

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to halt the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants. The administration defied the order, continuing the deportations while the judge was in a hearing on the matter.

Government Response

The Trump administration, through various officials including President Trump himself, demonstrated a disregard for the court order. President Trump even demanded the judge's impeachment.

Legal Arguments

The administration argued technicalities to avoid direct confrontation with the order, including claims of jurisdiction limitations once the planes left U.S. airspace. The judge, however, found these arguments lacking and expressed clear incredulity at the administration's actions. The core legal conflict centered around the application of the Alien Enemies Act, invoked by the Trump administration to justify deportations.

Constitutional Implications

The article suggests a broader constitutional crisis is unfolding, as the executive branch openly disregards a court ruling. The lack of direct mechanisms for the courts to enforce their orders in the face of such defiance is a major concern raised in the article. The article points out how far the administration's actions strayed from established legal precedents and reasonable interpretations of statutory language.

Judge's Reaction

The judge repeatedly expressed incredulity and frustration at the Justice Department's unwillingness to cooperate and provide information, creating a tense exchange highlighting the clash between the judicial and executive branches.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features