The University President Willing to Fight Trump - The New York Times

See original article

The Threat to Academic Freedom

President Eisgruber discusses the Trump administration's threats to universities, highlighting the suspension of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants to Princeton. He argues that the administration's actions represent a severe threat to academic freedom, comparing it to the Red Scare of the 1950s.

Columbia University's Capitulation

Eisgruber criticizes Columbia University's decision to concede to the administration's demands, emphasizing the importance of defending academic freedom despite the immense financial pressures. He expresses concern that such concessions could set a dangerous precedent.

Princeton's Reliance on Federal Funding

He reveals that Princeton receives approximately $250 million annually in federal funding, representing about 17-18% of its operating budget. While acknowledging the vulnerability created by this dependence, he argues that government funding is crucial for long-term research that private entities are unwilling or unable to support.

Concerns About Antisemitism

Eisgruber acknowledges the existence of antisemitism on college campuses, citing personal experiences and reports of harassment and unacceptable remarks. However, he strongly criticizes the administration's approach, arguing that it is inappropriate to use funding as a tool to control academic content and admissions practices.

Ideological Balance vs. Academic Freedom

Eisgruber distinguishes between the need to welcome conservative viewpoints on campuses and the imperative of not mirroring society's political ideologies. He emphasizes universities' responsibility to pursue truth and engage in robust debate, rather than simply reflecting the prevalent political climate.

Princeton's Response

Eisgruber declares Princeton's unwavering commitment to defending academic freedom and asserts that the university will not yield to the administration's demands. He describes the potential financial challenges but outlines steps, such as a soft hiring freeze and reallocation of resources, to mitigate the impact of a loss in government funding.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features