The article analyzes US President Donald Trump's assertion that the US needs to protect Greenland from China, a claim disputed by experts. Trump's comments, echoing similar statements in recent months, suggest a need for Greenland's protection due to perceived threats from Russian and Chinese vessels.
Experts question the Trump administration's assessment. While Chinese firms have attempted mining projects and bids for constructing airfields in Greenland, these initiatives have largely failed. There's little public evidence of aggressive Chinese incursions, with experts citing an almost non-existent Chinese military presence in Greenland's waters. Although Russia's military activity in regional northern seas is acknowledged, and China has increased naval activities off Alaska, the Trump administration has not provided sufficient details to support its claims.
The article acknowledges China's interest in Greenland's resources and strategic location, evident in economic pressures and their self-described role as a βnear Arctic power.β However, these aspirations haven't translated into a significant military presence. China's strategic interest stems from Greenland's mineral wealth, potential shipping routes, and geopolitical importance.
Greenland's Prime Minister and Denmark's Foreign Minister have both rejected Trump's suggestion of the US taking control of Greenland. While China has expressed commitment to Arctic cooperation based on respect and win-win principles, US intelligence indicates Russia's interest in Arctic naval routes. The article notes that Denmark, potentially under US pressure, has blocked several Chinese ventures in Greenland.
The article concludes that while China's long-term interests in the Arctic are undeniable, the Trump administration's claims of immediate Chinese military threats to Greenland lack substantial evidence. The focus on Greenland underscores the broader competition for power in the Arctic among major world powers.