The primary concern highlighted is the potential for governmental overreach into private speech regulation. The discussion also addresses the issue of the executive branch ignoring court orders.
The interview criticizes Facebook and Twitter's selective deplatforming of individuals, noting inconsistencies in their approach.
The interview explores the potential consequences of a President ignoring Supreme Court rulings, suggesting that all legal avenues would be pursued, possibly culminating in civil disobedience and significant public action if legal channels prove ineffective.
The concept of 'shutting down the country' is discussed as a potential last resort if the judicial system fails to enforce its rulings. This involves engaging corporate leaders and encouraging widespread public participation.
Historical examples of executive branch resistance to judicial authority are cited, including Marbury v. Madison and actions taken during the presidencies of FDR and Clinton. However, the current situation is described as significantly different.
Despite concerns about public apathy towards politics, the interview notes a recent increase in political engagement, suggesting that public action is still a viable possibility.