This article compares and contrasts the presidencies of Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) and Donald Trump, arguing that Trump's policies represent a reversal of FDR's New Deal policies. A historian, Eric Rauchway, is interviewed to provide expert insight.
Rauchway points out that Trump's actions, such as dismantling regulatory mechanisms, decreasing public investment, and diminishing resources for the Social Security Administration, directly oppose FDR's New Deal policies, which focused on building up government and creating a social safety net.
The article notes that while both presidents aimed at realigning political coalitions, their methods and outcomes differ significantly. FDR achieved lasting success, whereas Trump's popularity is argued to be more personal than a reflection of long-term political change.
The conversation also explores the contrasting economic policies of both presidents. Rauchway argues that Trump's tariff policies directly contradict the de-politicization of tariffs initiated under FDR.
The differing communication styles are also considered. FDR’s fireside chats, which created a shared national experience, are contrasted with Trump’s use of social media, which often promotes individualized engagement.
The article explores how court actions under each president are strikingly different, with FDR attempting to expand the influence of the executive branch and Trump opposing a judiciary largely composed of his own appointments.
Finally, the article discusses the 22nd Amendment, which imposed term limits after FDR's unprecedented four terms, and how this reflects a desire to avoid the concentration of power associated with such long tenures.