The article challenges the prevailing Western narrative that blames Russia solely for the Ukraine crisis. It argues that NATO expansion, EU eastward enlargement, and Western support for pro-democracy movements in Ukraine significantly contributed to the crisis by threatening Russia's core strategic interests.
The author details the history of NATO's eastward expansion, highlighting Russia's consistent opposition. The EU's Eastern Partnership initiative is also criticized for its perceived hostility towards Russia. These actions, according to the article, escalated tensions and ultimately led to the current conflict.
The article discusses the West's efforts to promote democracy and Western values in Ukraine, including significant financial investment. This is presented as a further provocation, causing Russia to fear for its own stability and interests.
The article alleges that Western powers actively supported the ouster of Ukrainian President Yanukovych, which served as a catalyst for Russia's annexation of Crimea and subsequent actions in eastern Ukraine. Russia's response is framed as a reaction to the perceived threat.
The author contends that the West's actions were rooted in a flawed liberal worldview that underestimated the importance of realpolitik and Russia's security concerns. The article emphasizes the strategic importance of Ukraine as a buffer state for Russia.
The article concludes by suggesting that the West should abandon its efforts to westernize Ukraine and instead support a neutral buffer state between NATO and Russia. This involves halting NATO expansion, creating a joint economic rescue plan, and limiting social engineering efforts. The author claims this would improve relations with Russia and benefit all sides.