The article analyzes President Trump's unexpected fixation on the number of dolls children should possess, linking it to his defense of controversial tariffs. Trump's comments, suggesting a limited number of dolls for girls, are presented as a misdirection tactic, deflecting criticism of the economic impact of his trade policies.
Trump's administration argues that the tariffs will revive jobs in traditionally male-dominated industries. However, the article points out that rising prices for various goods, not just dolls, are a consequence of these policies. The focus on dolls is interpreted as an attempt to portray concerns about material possessions as feminine and thus undesirable.
The article highlights criticism of Trump's rhetoric from various sources. Leah Greenberg of Indivisible suggests that the doll example is a tactic to deflect criticism by framing concern about the rising cost of goods as 'feminine'. Even some Republican lawmakers are reportedly expressing private concerns that the message is out of touch. The article notes the irony of the message coming from wealthy officials like Trump and Treasury Secretary Bessent.