SARAH VINE: The Queen asked just ONE thing of Harry and Meghan. Would it kill them to show respect for her memory? | Daily Mail Online


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Critique of Harry and Meghan

The article criticizes Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for using their royal titles for commercial purposes, specifically citing an incident where a gift basket from Meghan's brand included the 'HRH The Duchess of Sussex' designation. This action is viewed as a violation of an unspoken agreement with Queen Elizabeth II, who reportedly requested they not use their titles for personal gain.

Questioning Respect

The author questions whether Harry and Meghan genuinely respect the memory of the late Queen and the institution of the monarchy. They highlight instances such as naming their daughter Lilibet and registering domain names related to the royal family. These actions contradict their public statements about distancing themselves from royal life.

Exploiting Royal Connections

A central argument is that Harry and Meghan are profiting from their royal connections despite their claims to have stepped back from royal duties. The author suggests that Harry's current status and opportunities are directly linked to his royal heritage and that his wife's success might be tied to this as well.

Personal Gain and Lack of Self-Awareness

The author points out what they see as a lack of self-awareness and blatant disregard for the Queen's wishes. They argue that the couple's actions show a pattern of using their royal ties for personal financial gain.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the article questions Prince Harry's respect for his grandmother's wishes and his apparent complacency in allowing his wife to utilize his royal lineage for commercial ventures. The author concludes by emphasizing the Queen's simple request for respect and questioning whether Harry is fulfilling that request.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

The late Queen, it seems to me, didn’t ask for an awful lot. She did her job with dedication and grace, lived relatively frugally (for someone in her position), exercised her judgment with kindness and wisdom and was, on the whole, a forgiving soul.

She was certainly endlessly patient with the variously tricky egos in her life, even when they pushed her to limits most of us would have found intolerable.

But the one thing she did expect, particularly from those close to her, was respect for the role of monarchy and the institution itself, and a clear understanding that neither were to be taken for granted nor, more importantly, exploited.

For her, being a member of the Royal Family was an honour not a privilege – and certainly not an opportunity for personal gain. That is why she was so widely loved and respected, and why the Monarchy was safe in her hands.

It was also why, when Prince Harry and the Duchess of Sussex declared their desire to stand down as working royals and pursue a life as ordinary people across the Atlantic, the late Queen’s one stipulation was that they would not use their HRH titles.

It was a gentleperson’s agreement: no official documentation or royal decree was signed; it was simply an understanding based on mutual respect. Elizabeth II was very fond of her grandson, and he – or so he always said – of her.

She probably thought, having left him a tidy sum, which he inherited on his 40th birthday, as well as other bequests, he and his wife would neither need nor want to break her trust. Sadly, it appears she was wrong.

As part of her promotional blitz for her lifestyle brand As Ever, the Duchess sat down this week with the make-up entrepreneur and billionaire Jamie Kern Lima, who has a podcast. It was quite the performance.

The Duchess of Sussex's eyes glistened with tears of self-love as she spoke – without a trace of irony – about her time ‘in the trenches’ on Jamie Kern Lima's podcast

Lima ‘shared’ an image of a small wicker basket from Meghan's lifestyle brand, As Ever, accompanied by a note that said: ‘With the compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex’

Against a background of tinkly piano music, Lima lapped up the self-satisfied drivel with an expression of beatific smuggery reminiscent of a giant toad who has just swallowed the biggest, fattest, juiciest fly. There were a lot of blurry cutaways of the Duchess throwing her head back in joyous laughter, or rolling her eyes in faux self-deprecation. Those same eyes glistened with tears of self-love as she spoke – without a trace of irony – about her time ‘in the trenches’ (aka living in a rather nice house on the Windsor estate with not a single money worry, occasionally showing up for things in a nice dress and a tiara).

Neither of them wore make-up, presumably so their authenticity can be as visible as their pores. As a study in lack of self-awareness, it’s unintentionally hilarious – and useful should you ever find yourself in need of an emetic.

So far, so predictable. But then, presumably overwhelmed by emotion in the face of such unalloyed joy and wisdom, Lima ‘shared’ an image of a small wicker basket containing two tubs of ice-cream, a sprig of mint and a pot of the Duchess’s jam, accompanied by a note that said: ‘With the compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex’.

Now, if that doesn’t come under the heading of ‘using a Royal title for commercial purposes’, I don’t know what does. Sources ‘close to the couple’ have argued that, since the hamper was a personal gift, it does not count. But really, surely, that’s just splitting hairs? (Not to mention that imposing your HRH on to friends displays a Prince Andrew-level of pomposity). Simply, the title is not theirs to use. So why are they using it? More to the point, why do these two think they can get away with this? Do they think people are stupid? Does the Duchess think we simply won’t notice? And how much longer is she going to continue to cast herself as a victim of the British Monarchy – while all the time using it to flog her brand?

For this is by no means the first time. Despite apparently despising everything the Royal Family stands for, they named their daughter Lilibet, which was the late Queen’s nickname as a child, just to cement that connection. They even went so far as to register domain names for ‘LilibetDiana.com’ and ‘LiliDiana.com’ before the child’s birth.

Oh, and let’s not forget the telling-off that the Duchess gave to friend Mindy Kaling, who accidentally called her ‘Meghan Markle’ in an episode of her Netflix show. ‘You know I’m Sussex now,’ she purred, with all the warmth of a tiger about to sever its prey’s jugular.

For two people desperate to shrug off the mantle of royal life, Meghan and Harry seem to be very closely wrapped up in it. But in a way, it’s not the Duchess I blame the most. At the end of the day, it’s not her family she’s exploiting (not that she’s much kinder to them). It’s Prince Harry’s. The fact that he seems neither to mind nor want to do anything about it is telling. It’s either an indication of who wears the trousers in that relationship or proof that he really couldn’t care less about the wishes of his late grandmother – a woman without whom, let’s face it, he would be just another balding middle-aged man.

Prince Harry owes everything he has – from the ring on his wife’s finger to his beloved Invictus Games – to his Royal roots. He may not like it, but it’s the truth (in fact, would Meghan Markle, as she then was, even have given him a second glance had he not been a prince?).

The late Queen asked just one thing of him. Would it kill him, just for once in his life, to show some respect for her memory?

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!