The article examines the impact of prominent political figures in the Netherlands since Pim Fortuyn's rise in 2002. It lists nine such figures, highlighting their initial electoral success followed by their departures from mainstream politics. These figures, often labeled 'political saviors', have significantly influenced Dutch politics.
The prevalence of these 'political saviors' has fostered a cautious, even fearful, democratic environment. The constant need to appease these figures has resulted in political inaction on pressing issues such as housing, defense, and climate change.
The article compares two prominent 'political saviors': Geert Wilders and Pieter Omtzigt. Wilders thrives on conflict, using it as a political tool. Conversely, Omtzigt initially focused on exposing governmental wrongdoing. However, both demonstrate a preference for distance between government and coalition factions, leading to current political dysfunction.
The current coalition government has displayed a high level of internal conflict and instability. The article cites numerous news reports illustrating this pervasive discord, ultimately hindering effective governance. This constant focus on conflict is viewed as detrimental, potentially undermining public trust in the political system.
The article concludes that the pursuit of conflict, rather than effective governance, has become the norm. This trend, stemming from a quarter-century of 'political saviors,' has weakened the democratic process and fueled a desire for stronger, more centralized leadership. The coalition government’s inaction on addressing concerns regarding the state of democracy further emphasizes the severity of this issue.