This article presents a collection of letters to the editor of Het Parool, expressing strong opinions about columnist Theodor Holman's views on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Many readers criticize Holman's perceived obsession with the subject and its overshadowing of other important societal issues.
Several letters condemn Holman's allegedly one-sided perspective, accusing him of justifying the actions of Israel and ignoring the plight of the Palestinian people. His views are described as 'koolmonoxide' and exhibiting a 'gestoord wereldbeeld' (distorted worldview). Readers find his justifications for the bombing of civilian infrastructure unacceptable.
One letter acknowledges the value of freedom of speech and expression in columns, but questions the limit of its tolerance, specifically pointing to the harmful effects of Holman's allegedly biased reporting and use of fallacies. Another letter finds Holman's tendency to dismiss criticisms incomprehensible and indefensible.
While many letters criticize Holman, one reader mentions an interview with Sinan Çankaya as a positive and eye-opening experience, highlighting that the Israel-Palestine conflict's complexity demands continued dialogue despite its difficulties.
One letter raises the question of what accusations can be levied against a country that bombards hospitals and impedes humanitarian aid, challenging Holman's assertion that criticizing Israel for genocide is antisemitic.