Recently Read Articles

Create an account to save your articles and sync them across devices

Law

Supreme Court leaves New York law requiring ‘good moral character’ to carry handguns in place | CNN Politics

cnn.com Law USA

The Supreme Court declined to review a New York law requiring "good moral character" for handgun permits, leaving in place restrictions on carrying weapons in sensitive locations.

FAST FACTS: Know the difference between commonly confused legal terms

rappler.com Law Philippines

This article clarifies the differences between commonly confused legal terms such as life imprisonment and reclusion perpetua, amnesty and pardon, and parole and probation.

Know The Law | Distinction Between Gift/Settlement Deed & Will : Supreme Court Explains

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India clarified the distinctions between gift deeds, settlement deeds, and wills, emphasizing the timing of property transfer as the key differentiator.

Kunal Kamra moves Madras High Court seeking inter-State anticipatory bail - The Hindu

thehindu.com Law India

Stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra seeks inter-state anticipatory bail from the Madras High Court after receiving death threats following a police complaint in Mumbai.

Substantive Objections On Validity Or Existence Of Arbitration Agreement Can Be Adjudicated By Tribunal U/S 16 Of Act: Bombay HC

livelaw.in Law India

The Bombay High Court ruled that the arbitral tribunal, not the court, should adjudicate substantive objections to the validity of an arbitration agreement under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

Daniela Klette: Ex-RAF-Frau bereut nichts – Schimpftirade vor Gericht

nzz.ch Law Germany

Former Red Army Faction (RAF) member Daniela Klette faces trial in Celle, Germany, for armed robberies, showing no remorse and launching into a tirade against the justice system and perceived enemies.

New dog walking rules in France: Keep your pet on a lead from April 15

connexionfrance.com Law France

Starting April 15th, new French laws require dogs to be leashed outside designated paths in wooded areas to protect wildlife during breeding season, with fines up to €750 for violations.

Costa Concordia, Schettino rinuncia per ora alla semilibertà - Notizie - Ansa.it

ansa.it Law Italy

Francesco Schettino, the former captain of the Costa Concordia, withdrew his request for semilibertà due to difficulties with a proposed job opportunity.

The Supreme Court’s awful new deportation decision, explained | Vox

vox.com Law United States

The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision allows the Trump administration to resume deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, but requires notice and a chance to challenge removal, raising concerns about due process and potential bias in the Fifth Circuit.

A Swastika, a Tesla and a Debate Over the Limits of Hate Crime Law - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law USA

The vandalism of Teslas with swastikas sparks debate over whether it constitutes a hate crime against Elon Musk or a broader expression of antisemitism.

WB SSC Scam | Supreme Court Sets Aside Calcutta HC Direction For CBI Investigation Into Govt Decision For Supernumerary Posts

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India overturned a Calcutta High Court order mandating a CBI investigation into the creation of supernumerary posts by the West Bengal government to accommodate allegedly illegal appointees in the 2016 WB SSC recruitment scandal.

Writ Courts Can Suo Motu Strike Down Subordinate Legislation : Supreme Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India affirmed the power of Writ Courts to strike down subordinate legislation violating fundamental rights, even suo motu, but cautioned against its frequent use.

A $4 Billion Sex Abuse Settlement in L.A., After Childhoods of ‘Pure Hell’ - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law United States

Los Angeles County will pay $4 billion to settle lawsuits from thousands of people who allege they were sexually abused as children in county foster care and juvenile detention systems.

Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce Alien Enemies Act for rapid deportations for now | CNN Politics

cnn.com Law World

The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to use the Alien Enemies Act for expedited deportations, but mandated adequate notice and review opportunities for affected individuals.

‘Veel mensen geven signaal dat ze dit niet meer pikken’: boosheid en verontwaardiging nu verkrachter straf ontloopt | De Morgen

demorgen.be Law Belgium

Public outrage erupts in Belgium after a rapist avoids punishment due to his promising career prospects, sparking a debate about class justice and the handling of sexual assault cases.

Patentanwalt beleidigt Nachbarn: Gerichtsverhandlung in Laufen

chiemgau24.de Law Germany

A patent lawyer in Laufen, Germany, faces trial for insulting his neighbor, leading to a heated courtroom exchange and accusations of ongoing disputes.

Read all Latest Updates on and about National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors And Ors.| 2023 LiveLaw SC 313

livelaw.in Law India

This article provides updates on the Supreme Court case, National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors And Ors. (2023 LiveLaw SC 313).

Tasma Walton: Judge rules that actor is Indigenous and ‘an honest witness’ in native title case

theage.com.au Law Australia

A judge ruled that Australian actor Tasma Walton is Indigenous and a credible witness in a native title case, relying on oral traditions to support her claim despite challenges from opposing parties.

Cidadania italiana: saiba tudo o que muda com as novas regras | GZH

gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br Law Brazil

New Italian citizenship laws restrict eligibility to two generations and impact thousands of Brazilians seeking citizenship.

Dani Alves, un caso endiablado | Opinión | EL PAÍS

elpais.com Law Spain

This opinion piece analyzes the controversial Dani Alves trial, highlighting the complexities of the legal process, the importance of the presumption of innocence, and the need for support for those affected by such cases, regardless of the outcome.

InView, het platform voor de jurist en fiscalist

inview.nl Law Netherlands

The InView platform, a resource for legal and tax professionals, requires login to access content about extended statute of limitations.

Dismissed PMA cadet Cudia's case 'closed and terminated'

rappler.com Law Philippines

The Supreme Court in the Philippines has finally denied the dismissed PMA cadet Jeff Aldrin Cudia's third appeal, concluding his case and upholding his dismissal from the academy for violating the honor code.

Draft Arbitration And Conciliation Amendment Bill 2024, ADR, Appellate Arbitral Tribunals, American Arbitration Association, European Court of Arbitration, emergency arbitration, Ministry of Finance, Kochhar & Co

livelaw.in Law India

India's Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aims to modernize arbitration practices but faces criticism over its potential impact on foreign investment and its unclear provisions on interim relief and time limits.

Elon Musk’s X sues union government over alleged censorship and IT Act violations - The Hindu

thehindu.com Law India

Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) filed a lawsuit in India challenging the government's content regulation and censorship practices, claiming violations of free speech and due process.

Justiça condena aluno da UFRGS a prisão por racismo contra coordenador do MBL | GZH

gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br Law Brazil

A Brazilian court sentenced Álvaro Körbes Hauschild to prison for racist remarks made online against a student coordinator.

Prosecution Under UP Gangsters Act Permissible Even In Case Of A Single FIR/Charge-sheet for Anti-Social Activities: Supreme Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that prosecution under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, is permissible even with a single FIR or charge sheet if the crime involves anti-social activities as defined in the Act.

Nyheter från Newsworthy

newsworthy.se Law Sweden

Fewer than average contact bans are granted in Linköping, Sweden, prompting an upcoming law change to ease the process.

Stap voor stap lijken we collectief onze rechtsstaat te ondermijnen | De Morgen

demorgen.be Law Belgium

A controversial court decision in Belgium, where a medical student was acquitted of rape, sparks a debate about the justice system's shortcomings and societal biases.

When Can Entire Selection Process Be Set Aside For Irregularities? Supreme Court Lays Down 4 Key Principles

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India established four key principles for determining when an entire selection process should be nullified due to irregularities, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation and considering the balance between upholding process integrity and avoiding undue hardship to unaffected candidates.

Succession and administration of estate

blog.ipleaders.in Law India

This article explains the process of estate administration and succession under Islamic law in India, including the roles of executors and administrators, and the impact of the Uniform Civil Code.

I can see my neighbour sunbathing naked in his back garden. Is he breaking the law? DEAN DUNHAM has the answer | This is Money

thisismoney.co.uk Law UK

A legal expert answers whether a neighbor sunbathing naked in their garden is breaking the law, considering intent, distress caused, and potential legal recourse.

Warning over disturbing sex trend as expert blasts life-changing risks - what you NEED to know | The Scottish Sun

thescottishsun.co.uk Law Scotland

Recent landmark prosecutions in Scotland highlight the criminalization of 'stealthing,' the non-consensual removal of a condom during sex, emphasizing the importance of consent and raising awareness of underreported sexual assaults.

Federal prosecutors announce more charges against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs | CNN

cnn.com Law USA

Federal prosecutors have added two more charges against Sean "Diddy" Combs, bringing the total to five, just one month before his sex trafficking trial.

Conde-Pumpido se queda solo en su maniobra para evitar que Europa le examine

abc.es Law Spain

Internal reports contradict Spanish Constitutional Court President Conde-Pumpido's attempt to prevent a referral to the European Court of Justice regarding the court's 'amnesty' in the ERE case.

SCOTUS Backs Trump — for Now — on Alien Enemies Act | The New York Sun

nysun.com Law World

The Supreme Court temporarily sided with Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting Venezuelan gang members, but the decision leaves the broader legality of the act unresolved.

Prison chiefs accused of blocking mother jailed for social media post from seeing daughter

telegraph.co.uk Law UK

A jailed mother is being prevented from seeing her daughter, allegedly due to prison officials' concerns about social media and public attention.

Trump’s tariffs sure look illegal. Will the Supreme Court stop them?

slate.com Law World

The legality of President Trump's tariffs is challenged, raising questions about executive authority and the potential for Supreme Court intervention.

Doctrine of reasonable classification - iPleaders

blog.ipleaders.in Law India

This article provides a comprehensive explanation of the doctrine of reasonable classification in Indian constitutional law, outlining its concept, scope, and significance.

Justice Nariman's Revival Of Doctrine Of "Manifest Arbitrariness" To Strike Down Legislation

livelaw.in Law India

Justice Nariman's revival of the doctrine of 'manifest arbitrariness' has significantly impacted Indian constitutional law, leading to the striking down of several legislative provisions deemed unreasonable or discriminatory.

El casar se va a acabar | La Rioja

larioja.com Law Spain

A recent law reform in La Rioja, Spain, eliminates the ability of justices of the peace to officiate civil weddings, impacting couples who preferred their impartiality.

‘Like a Pied Piper’: Children were attracted to me, says alleged school predator

smh.com.au Law Australia

A former Australian teacher is on trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse, with the prosecution arguing he hid his predatory behavior in plain sight while his defense claims he is a victim of long-standing rumors.

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Challenge to New York State Gun Law | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law USA

The Supreme Court's refusal to hear a challenge to New York's restrictive gun law upholds a lower court decision that partially struck down but largely affirmed the law's provisions.

El juez Peinado ignora durante meses los recursos contra sus decisiones en el ‘caso Begoña Gómez’ | España | EL PAÍS

elpais.com Law Spain

Judge Juan Carlos Peinado's handling of the Begoña Gómez case has drawn heavy criticism for his months-long delays in addressing appeals and his questionable procedural practices.

Judge Boasberg Cancels Hearing After SCOTUS Vacates His Orders | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law USA

The Supreme Court's decision to vacate a lower court's orders blocking the deportation of Venezuelan gang members led to the cancellation of a hearing and a shift in the legal proceedings.

Contratos de trabajo | Periodo de prueba extendido sin razón válida: lo que podría pasar con tu contrato | empresa | trabajador | estabilidad laboral | despido | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

A Peruvian Supreme Court case highlights the importance of properly justifying extended probationary periods in employment contracts, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of complexity and specialized training.

Indecopi ratifica plazo de un año para independización de inmuebles ¿qué considerar? | departamentos | titulo de propiedad | | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

Peru's Indecopi has established a one-year timeframe for completing property title independent, clarifying that this is the reasonable time frame if no timeframe is specified in the contract.

Inmuebles: dueños son responsabilizados por actos ilegales de inquilinos: ¿es posible? | alquiler de inmuebles | departamentos | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

A new municipal ordinance in San Juan de Miraflores, Peru, holds property owners responsible for illegal activities of their tenants, sparking debate about its legality and potential impact.

Vacaciones en venta: ¿Es posible ceder días de descanso a cambio de dinero? | compensación | empleo | laboral | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

Peruvian labor law allows employees to sell up to 15 vacation days, but only under specific conditions and with employer consent; failure to take vacation within the established period results in triple compensation.

Actos de violencia fuera del trabajo como motivo suficiente para un despido | Falta grave | Corte Suprema | Reputación | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

The Peruvian Supreme Court ruled that an employee's violent actions outside of work constituted grounds for dismissal, emphasizing the impact on employer trust and company reputation.

Miraflores | Bares y restaurantes se “libran” de exigencias ilegales, ¿de qué se trata? | seguridad | armas | ordenanza | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

A Peruvian court ruled that Miraflores municipality's regulations on bars and restaurants, requiring weapon detectors and staff training, were illegal due to exceeding their legal authority.

Indecopi | Cuidado con el uso de imágenes: lo que puede costar no pedir permiso | derechos de autor | municipalidad | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

A Peruvian municipality was fined by Indecopi for unauthorized use of a photograph in its public promotions, highlighting the importance of obtaining consent and paying royalties for copyrighted material.

Construir sin licencia: las implicancias legales que podrían llevar a prisión | viviendas | inmueble | edificaciones | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

A Peruvian court case highlights the legal consequences of unlicensed construction, emphasizing the importance of adhering to urban regulations, especially in protected areas, with potential prison sentences for significant violations.

Miraflores y el comercio ambulatorio: Indecopi aclara situación en el distrito | Barreras burocráticas | Heladeros | ordenanzas | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

gestion.pe Law Peru

Indecopi ruled against Miraflores' restrictions on itinerant street vendors, declaring them illegal and highlighting the need for consistent provincial regulations.

SAP Alicante 596/2024, 29 de Noviembre de 2024 - Jurisprudencia - VLEX 1068890248

vlex.es Law Spain

This legal document details an appeal in a Spanish court regarding a lawsuit concerning the impugnation of corporate agreements and inheritance issues within a family-owned company.

DOJ Says Judge Lacks Authority to Demand US Return Deported Alleged Gang Member | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law United States

The Department of Justice argues a Maryland judge lacks authority to order the return of a deported alleged gang member from El Salvador, prompting a legal battle.

Rachel Sheherazade perde processo que movia contra SBT - 11/03/2025 - Outro Canal - F5

f5.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

A Brazilian court has definitively ruled against Rachel Sheherazade in her lawsuit against SBT, dismissing her claims and ordering her to pay legal fees.

Trump deportation: Judge orders return of man mistakenly sent to notorious El Salvador prison

smh.com.au Law United States

A federal judge ordered the return of a Salvadoran man mistakenly deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador, criticizing the Trump administration's actions as 'wholly lawless'.

Gerichtsverhandlung in Salzburg nimmt überraschende Wendung: Angeklagter droht Richterin

chiemgau24.de Law Austria

A 48-year-old Austrian man received a suspended sentence for threatening a judge during a court hearing in Salzburg.

Specific Performance Suit Not Maintainable For Cancelled Sale Agreement Without Seeking Declaration Against Cancellation : Supreme Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that a suit for specific performance of a cancelled sale agreement is not maintainable without a prior declaration challenging the cancellation's validity.

Fernando Madureira tinha saco de papel com 31 mil euros debaixo da cama | Justiça | PÚBLICO

publico.pt Law Portugal

During a raid related to Operation Pretorian, authorities found over €31,000 in cash hidden under the bed of Fernando Madureira, former leader of the Super Dragões fan group.

Wife Can Be Affected By Defamation Of Husband; Apart From Individual Reputations, Spouses Share Common Family Reputation : Supreme Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that a wife's reputation can be harmed by defamation against her husband, acknowledging the concept of a shared 'family reputation'.

Land Acquisition Act | Supreme Court Explains Principle Of De-Escalation, Says Highest Of Sale Exemplars Must Be Taken

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India upheld the principle of using the highest sale exemplar for land acquisition compensation, increasing the award for land acquired in Haryana.

Bianca Santana: Brasil cria importante precedente jurídico - 06/04/2025 - Bianca Santana - Folha

www1.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

The Brazilian justice system's final confirmation of Juan Darthés's conviction for raping Thelma Fardin sets a significant legal precedent, prioritizing the victim's testimony in sexual assault cases.

Investigações sobre venda de decisões atingem 14 tribunais - 07/04/2025 - Poder - Folha

www1.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

Investigations into the sale of judicial decisions in Brazil have implicated at least 14 courts, involving judges, staff, and even relatives, highlighting the systemic nature of corruption within the judiciary.

Ordenan embargo de lujoso departamento de Hermosilla - La Tercera

latercera.com Law Chile

A Chilean court has ordered the seizure of a luxury apartment belonging to lawyer Luis Hermosilla due to significant unpaid debts to Scotiabank.

Rungnapha Kanbut sex slavery trial: Juror discharged after bringing knife to court

smh.com.au Law Australia

A juror in the Rungnapha Kanbut sex slavery trial was discharged after bringing a knife to court and attempting to engage in conversation with the judge's associate.

Zivilcourage mit Folgen: Vom Retter zum Beschuldigten in Zürich - Blick

blick.ch Law Switzerland

A Good Samaritan in Zurich, Switzerland, who intervened in an assault, faces legal charges himself after the attacker filed a counter-complaint.

Could Trump’s ‘Path of Perfect Lawlessness’ Set Him on a Collision Course With Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court? | The New York Sun

nysun.com Law World

A Fourth Circuit Court rebuke of the Trump administration's deportation tactics highlights a potential conflict between the executive and judicial branches, potentially leading to a Supreme Court confrontation.

Wilson Sonsini Partner Trio Takes Team to Baker McKenzie Following Beijing Closure

law.com Law China

A group of senior lawyers from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's Hong Kong office, including its Greater China capital markets head, has joined Baker McKenzie's FenXun Partners in Greater China.

Norfolk police officer 'dressed inappropriately with victim' | Beccles & Bungay Journal

becclesandbungayjournal.co.uk Law England

Two Norfolk police officers face misconduct hearings; one for inappropriate behavior during a victim interview, the other for alleged phone misuse and unlawful search.

El youtuber que llamó 'caranchoa' a un repartidor, condenado a indemnizarle con 20.000 euros por daños morales

eldiario.es Law Spain

A Spanish court upheld a ruling ordering a former YouTuber to pay €20,000 in moral damages to a delivery worker he insulted and filmed without consent.

Alves, Le Pen y los malditos jueces, por Javier Melero

lavanguardia.com Law World

The article analyzes the differing public reactions to the legal cases of Dani Alves and Marine Le Pen, highlighting the tension between legal processes and their societal impact.

Delhi HC sets aside order dismissing to take on record certificate under Section 65-B of IEA | SCC Times

scconline.com Law India

The Delhi High Court overturned a lower court's dismissal of a certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, deeming its rejection a hyper-technical procedural error.

2008 Bangalore Blasts Case | Supreme Court Allows Section 65B Evidence Act Certificate at Any Trial Stage

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that a Section 65B certificate for electronic evidence can be submitted at any stage of a trial, overturning a Karnataka High Court decision in the 2008 Bangalore Blasts case.

Need To Introspect Why Many Women Are Unwilling To Continue In Legal Profession: Justice BV Nagarathna

livelaw.in Law India

Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna highlights the need for introspection within the legal field to understand why many women leave the profession, emphasizing the impact of gendered prejudices and systemic issues.

Arbitral Tribunal Can Proceed Against Party Though They Weren't Served With S.21 Notice Or Made Party In S.11 Application : Supreme Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that not being served a Section 21 notice or included in a Section 11 application doesn't prevent someone from being added to arbitration proceedings if they are party to the arbitration agreement.

What Recourse Does the Supreme Court Actually Have? - The Atlantic

theatlantic.com Law United States

Federal judges are considering using contempt of court charges against the Trump administration for defying court orders regarding the deportation of migrants.

CFPB preliminary injunction likely modified by appeals panel | American Banker

americanbanker.com Law United States

A federal appeals panel is considering modifying a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's attempts to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

CDE rechaza demanda de Patio Bellavista contra el Fisco y niega existencia de “zona de sacrificio” - La Tercera

latercera.com Law Chile

The Chilean State Defense Council (CDE) rejected a lawsuit filed by Patio Bellavista against the government, arguing the claim is time-barred and denying the existence of a "sacrifice zone".

Law firm Aird & Berlis opens Vancouver office - The Globe and Mail

theglobeandmail.com Law Canada

Aird & Berlis LLP, a Toronto-based law firm, expands its operations by opening a new office in Vancouver, fueled by the growth of its Indigenous law practice group.

Sudac Mirko Živić priveden sucu istrage | Telegram.hr

telegram.hr Law Croatia

A Croatian judge, Mirko Živić, was arrested and is under investigation for allegedly forging documents related to a Moldovan citizen's extended detention.

El exdirector de Ciencias Forenses avisa a la Fiscalía de un error científico en la absolución de Dani Alves | Sociedad | EL PAÍS

elpais.com Law Spain

A former director of Spain's National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences claims a scientific error in the acquittal of Dani Alves on sexual assault charges.

Práctica MODELO Solicita Atribución Del Cuidado Personal Unilateral | PDF | Caso de ley | Justicia

es.scribd.com Law Argentina

A legal document in Argentina requests unilateral child custody due to the mother's prolonged absence and the negative impact on the child.

Inicia Demanda Por Cuidado Personal Unilateral de Los Hijos. Acredita Mediación | PDF | Instituciones sociales | Ciencias sociales

es.scribd.com Law Argentina

A father in Argentina is filing for sole custody of his children due to alleged physical abuse by their mother and her partner, supported by a mediation attempt.

Quale Ufficio territoriale dell’Agenzia può stare in giudizio? - Euroconference News

ecnews.it Law Italy

Two recent Italian Supreme Court rulings clarify which territorial office of the Agenzia delle Entrate can be a party in tax litigation, emphasizing the agency's unified nature and the principle of effective judicial protection.

S.12 DV Act | Mother-In-Law Harassed Or Tortured By Daughter-In-Law Can File Complaint To Magistrate For Relief: Allahabad High Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a mother-in-law who experiences harassment or torture from her daughter-in-law can file a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

Muertos dana | Una acusación popular en la dana afirma que hay certificados de defunción con la fecha equivocada | Las Provincias

lasprovincias.es Law Spain

A popular accusation in the Dana case in Valencia, Spain, alleges that some death certificates have incorrect dates, raising questions about the official handling of the flood victims.

Llegó por una emergencia obstétrica y salió con antecedentes penales: así funciona el proceso por aborto en el Perú | ECDATA | EL COMERCIO PERÚ

elcomercio.pe Law Peru

This article details the devastating effects of Peru's criminalization of abortion on women, highlighting the disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations and the role of healthcare professionals in perpetuating the issue.

Justice Sanjeev Kumar appointed as acting Chief Justice of Jammu & Kashmir High Court - The Hindu

thehindu.com Law India

Justice Sanjeev Kumar has been appointed as the acting Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court following the retirement of the incumbent.

[Section 216 CrPC] Court Can Add Or Alter Charges At Any Time, Even After Reserving Judgment: SC [Read Judgment]

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India clarified that courts can alter or add charges under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure even after reserving judgment, ensuring a fair trial without causing undue prejudice to the accused.

Judge rules for Ryan Walters in defamation suit filed by former teacher

oklahoman.com Law Oklahoma

A federal judge ruled in favor of Oklahoma schools Superintendent Ryan Walters in a defamation lawsuit filed by a former teacher, Summer Boismier, who protested a state law restricting classroom discussions on race and gender.

Restraining order sought against Glenna Bevin by adopted son | Lexington Herald Leader

kentucky.com Law Kentucky

Jonah Bevin, adopted son of former Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, seeks a restraining order against his adoptive mother, Glenna Bevin, to obtain documents related to his Ethiopian biological family.

Trump Administration: Live Updates and Latest News - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law World

The Supreme Court partially sided with a lower court's order to facilitate the return of a Salvadoran migrant wrongly deported by the Trump administration, prompting debate over executive branch authority and the rule of law.

Meta goes to trial to avoid a breakup | The Verge

theverge.com Law United States

Meta is facing a crucial antitrust trial where the FTC alleges that its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were anti-competitive, potentially leading to a company breakup.

Supreme Court Sides With Migrant Trump Administration Wrongly Deported - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law World

The Supreme Court ruled that the government must facilitate the return of a Salvadoran migrant wrongly deported by the Trump administration, but stopped short of directly ordering it.

Former Ma Kelly's boss and accountant on trial at Preston Crown Court over fraud charges

blackpoolgazette.co.uk Law England

The former owner of the Ma Kelly's bar chain and his accountant are on trial at Preston Crown Court, facing multi-million pound fraud charges related to alleged tax evasion.

Family Wins Suit Against Conspiracist Who Called Manchester Bombing a Hoax - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law England

A British court ruled that a conspiracy theorist who falsely claimed the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing was a hoax must pay damages to the Hibbert family, who were severely injured in the attack.

Court rules congregation can be evicted from R.I.'s Touro Synagogue

bostonglobe.com Law Rhode Island

A Rhode Island court ruled that Congregation Jeshuat Israel must be evicted from the Touro Synagogue, ending a long-standing legal battle between two congregations.

Delhi High Court Verdict In Airports Authority Of India Case Is A Renewed Call To Uphold The Spirit Of The Arbitration Act

livelaw.in Law India

The Delhi High Court's recent upholding of an arbitral award in the Airports Authority of India case reinforces the importance of minimal judicial intervention in arbitration, promoting confidence in India's arbitration process.

Hashem Abedi denies assaulting 'filthy pig' prison officer

telegraph.co.uk Law World

Hashem Abedi and Ahmed Hassan, both facing assault charges, pleaded not guilty in court, with Hassan expressing strong religious objections to the proceedings.

Conor McGregor plans to call two new witnesses in civil rape case | Irish Independent

independent.ie Law World

Conor McGregor's legal team plans to present affidavits from two new witnesses who claim to have seen or heard another man assaulting Nikita Hand on the night of December 9, 2018.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll - The Washington Post

washingtonpost.com Law USA

A judge clarified that the jury's finding of sexual abuse against Donald Trump in the E. Jean Carroll case constitutes rape under a broader, commonly understood definition.

El Tribunal Superior vasco anula el artículo que obliga a tener contrato de alquiler o ser propietario para percibir la RGI | El Correo

elcorreo.com Law Spain

The Basque Country's Superior Court of Justice annulled a regulation requiring rental contracts or property ownership to receive the RGI (Guaranteed Income), impacting access to social welfare.

Gorbe v. City of Lathrup Vill. - Case Brief Summary for Law School Success

studicata.com Law USA

Three Lathrup Village police officers sued the city for age, race, and disability discrimination and retaliation, resulting in a mixed outcome in court.

Communication Blockade And Curbs On Media Freedom In Kashmir: Foundation for Media Professionals Moves SC

livelaw.in Law India

The Foundation for Media Professionals (FMP) filed an intervention application with the Supreme Court of India supporting a petition challenging communication blockades and media restrictions in Kashmir.

Freedom Of Expression Doesn't Give Citizens The Right To Speak Sans Responsibility On Social Media: Allahabad High Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Allahabad High Court ruled that freedom of expression on social media does not absolve individuals from responsibility for their words, upholding a case against a woman accused of online abuse.

Safe Harbor: Bridge To Innovation Amidst The Waters Of Liability?

livelaw.in Law World

Safe harbor provisions, legal immunities for online platforms hosting user-generated content, are analyzed across various jurisdictions, highlighting the global debate on balancing innovation and accountability.

What's In A Name? A Lot, Especially If That Name Is "Anti-National"

livelaw.in Law India

This article analyzes the ambiguous use of the term "anti-national" in Indian law, highlighting its lack of clear definition and potential for arbitrary application.

"Media Shall Be Made Accountable For Hate Speech, Fake News, Breach of Privacy": Plea In Supreme Court Seeks Establishment Of Media Tribunal

livelaw.in Law India

A film producer has petitioned the Indian Supreme Court to establish a Media Tribunal to regulate misinformation, hate speech, and breaches of privacy in media.

Section 377 is gone, but some fear the proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita does not protect men against rape. This is why. | Explained News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com Law India

The proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's omission of provisions protecting men from rape raises concerns about legal recourse for male victims of sexual assault in India.

Ryan Reynolds says Justin Baldoni can’t sue over ‘hurt feelings’ after alleged Deadpool diss | The Independent

independent.co.uk Law World

Ryan Reynolds is attempting to dismiss Justin Baldoni's lawsuit, claiming Baldoni's complaints are based on 'hurt feelings' rather than provable defamation.

Juiz que forjou nome de britânico e vai brigar por salário - 18/04/2025 - Cotidiano - Folha

www1.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

A retired Brazilian judge, who used a false British identity for 45 years, is fighting to regain his pension while facing charges of false representation.

The Supreme Court case that seeks to make everyone’s health insurance worse, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Vox

vox.com Law United States

The Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, challenges the Department of Health and Human Services' authority to mandate preventative health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, potentially impacting access to crucial treatments.

Pa. Supreme Court asked to replace judge in suspended trooper’s vehicular homicide case - pennlive.com

pennlive.com Law Pennsylvania

A Pennsylvania state trooper convicted of vehicular homicide is petitioning the state Supreme Court to overturn the verdict due to alleged juror misconduct and replace the presiding judge.

Application Seeking Recall Of Compromise Decree Can Be Filed Before The Court Which Granted It : Supreme Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that an application to recall a compromise decree due to fraud can be filed before the court that issued the decree.

Property Seized By ED Must Be Returned If PMLA Probe Continues Beyond 365 Days And Does Not Result In Any Proceedings: Delhi High Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Delhi High Court ruled that property seized by the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act must be returned if the investigation exceeds 365 days without resulting in any proceedings.

"Reasons To Believe": A System Of Checks & Balances On The Powers Of The Enforcement Directorate Under PMLA, 2002

livelaw.in Law India

The article analyzes the legal requirements and judicial interpretations of the 'reasons to believe' clause within India's Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, highlighting its role as a check on the Enforcement Directorate's powers.

Important Judgments Of Madras High Court 2022

livelaw.in Law India

The Madras High Court delivered 525 significant judgments in 2022, covering diverse legal issues impacting various aspects of Indian society.

Cloud Particle Scam: Punjab & Haryana HC Refuses To De-Freeze Accused Company's Accounts, Rejects Claims Against ED Search & Seizure

livelaw.in Law India

The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the Enforcement Directorate's seizure of assets from Vuenow Infotech Pvt. Ltd., rejecting the company's challenge to the investigation of its alleged involvement in a cloud particle investment scam.

ED's Power Under PML Act Rests On The Quartet-Test Of 'Search', 'Seize', 'Proceeds Of Crime' & 'Money-Laundering': Calcutta High Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Calcutta High Court clarified the Enforcement Directorate's powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, emphasizing the necessity of a 'quartet-test' involving search, seizure, proceeds of crime, and money-laundering for legal action.

Without Proving Knowledge About Proceeds Of Crime, Can Money Laundering Be Presumed? Supreme Court Asks ED

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India questioned whether money laundering can be presumed without proving knowledge of proceeds of crime, leading to a discussion on the legal definition and implications of acquittals in money laundering cases.

The Glaring Illegality Of Ban Orders Against Asianet News & Media One TV

livelaw.in Law India

The Indian government's ban on Asianet News and Media One TV for their reporting on the Delhi riots is legally flawed due to vague reasoning and disproportionate penalties.

Supreme Court Dismisses Amnesty International's Challenge Against ED Freezing Bank Accounts As Provisional Attachment Order Was Passed In Meantime

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court dismissed Amnesty International India's challenge to the Enforcement Directorate's freezing of its bank accounts, deferring the challenge to the provisional attachment order.

Civil Judges' Recruitment : Gujarat & Karnataka HCs Suspend Selection Process To Await Supreme Court Judgment On Minimum Practice Condition

livelaw.in Law India

The Gujarat and Karnataka High Courts have suspended the recruitment process for Civil Judges, awaiting the Supreme Court's decision on the minimum practice requirement for applicants.

‘Mijn vrienden en ik hebben al zo vaak dronken seks gehad. Kunnen we dan allemaal vervolgd worden?’: studenten over het begrip ‘toestemming’ | Humo: The Wild Site

humo.be Law Belgium

A Belgian article discusses the complexities of consent and sexual assault among students, particularly when alcohol is involved, sparked by a controversial court case.

Sulla competenza della Sezione specializzata in materia di imprese in materia di fideiussione su modello ABI | Giurisprudenza delle imprese

giurisprudenzadelleimprese.it Law Italy

A court ruling clarifies the jurisdiction over challenges to surety bonds based on antitrust violations, determining that such objections are part of the opposition to summary judgment proceedings rather than separate claims.

The Feasibility Of A Police Officer Independently Obtaining The Specimen Signatures And Handwritings Of An Accused Person During The Stage Of Investigation

livelaw.in Law India

This legal article analyzes the legality of police obtaining specimen signatures and handwriting from accused persons during investigations in India, considering various laws, court precedents, and constitutional rights.

The Supreme Court threatens to bring “don’t say gay” to every classroom in America, in Mahmoud v. Taylor | Vox

vox.com Law World

The Supreme Court is considering a case that could broadly restrict discussions of LGBTQ+ themes in schools nationwide, potentially mirroring Florida's controversial 'Don't Say Gay' law.

Il est soupçonné d’avoir modifié la teneur en THC de ses produits : un gérant de plusieurs commerces de CBD interpellé dans le Gard - midilibre.fr

midilibre.fr Law France

A CBD shop owner in the Gard region of France was arrested and charged with selling products exceeding the legal THC limit, after customers reported adverse effects.

Appeals Court Halts Judge Boasberg’s Contempt Order in Deportations Case | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law United States

An appeals court temporarily halted a contempt order against the Trump administration for not complying with a judge's order prohibiting deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

Judge in Abrego Garcia case says there’s no evidence Trump administration is following her orders | CNN Politics

cnn.com Law World

A federal judge criticizes the Trump administration's lack of action in returning a mistakenly deported man from a dangerous Salvadoran prison, ordering expedited discovery to determine compliance with her court orders.

What could the For Women Scotland judgment mean for women’s rights? | The Spectator

spectator.co.uk Law Scotland

The UK Supreme Court is set to rule on the legal definition of 'woman' in relation to Scotland's Gender Representation on Public Boards Act 2018, a case brought by For Women Scotland.

Boston Police Department under fire as it faces contempt threat

bostonherald.com Law USA

The Boston Police Department faces contempt charges for failing to provide records in an internal affairs investigation involving an officer implicated in a fatal high-speed chase and other misconduct allegations.

Un juez ordena la devolución a sus padres de una bebé que fue retirada por el difícil pasado de la madre | España | EL PAÍS

elpais.com Law Spain

A Spanish court ordered the return of a baby to her parents after social services removed her due to the mother's difficult past, highlighting concerns about due process and potential risks to the child's welfare.

NHS Fife told to 'admit defeat' in Sandie Peggie tribunal

thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

A landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of “woman” in the Equality Act 2010 is prompting calls for NHS Fife to concede defeat in a tribunal brought by a nurse who clashed with a transgender colleague.

El Tribunal Supremo del Reino Unido limita la definición legal de mujer al sexo biológico | Sociedad | EL PAÍS

elpais.com Law UK

The UK Supreme Court ruled that the 2010 Equality Act's definition of 'woman' refers solely to biological sex, limiting legal protections for transgender women.

State constable stopped for speeding charged with DUI in Woodward Township | News, Sports, Jobs - Williamsport Sun-Gazette

sungazette.com Law Pennsylvania

A Pennsylvania state constable was arrested for DUI and speeding after failing to stop for police, claiming he was en route to a sobriety checkpoint.

Supreme Court immigration ruling: Due process in theory, deportation in practice - Los Angeles Times

latimes.com Law World

The Supreme Court's ruling on the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport immigrants sparks debate, with both supporters and critics highlighting aspects of the decision.

The Supreme Court considers tearing a new hole in the wall separating church and state | Vox

vox.com Law USA

The Supreme Court case, Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond, challenges the separation of church and state in public education by considering whether a religious public charter school can be established.

UK Supreme Court Says Trans Women Are Not Legally Women Under Equality Act - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law UK

The UK Supreme Court ruled that the Equality Act's definition of 'woman' is based on biological sex, impacting transgender rights and single-sex services.

American citizen Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez detained under ICE hold in Florida is released | CNN

cnn.com Law USA

A US-born citizen was wrongly detained by ICE in Florida under a recently blocked state law, highlighting concerns about racial profiling and immigrants' rights.

Transgender rights ruling: UK’s highest court finds that a ‘woman’ is someone born biologically female

smh.com.au Law UK

The UK Supreme Court ruled that a ‘woman’ is someone born biologically female, sparking mixed reactions and raising concerns about the implications for transgender rights and single-sex services.

Alud de demandas en los juzgados de Bilbao antes de la mediación obligatoria | El Correo

elcorreo.com Law Spain

A surge in lawsuits in Bilbao courts before mandatory mediation caused delays and concerns about the new law's implementation.

Men Who Identify as Transgender Are Not Women, UK Supreme Court Rules | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law UK

The UK Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of "woman" refers to biological sex, excluding transgender men with gender recognition certificates from certain single-sex spaces.

Diddy Wants to Delay Sex-Trafficking Trial by Two Months

vulture.com Law USA

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is seeking a two-month postponement of his sex-trafficking trial in New York, citing the need for more time to prepare a defense following a recent superseding indictment.

"Overt Discrimination Has Now Become Systemic; Casteist, Ableist, Genderist Hierarchies Entrenched Structures In Society": Justice DY Chandrachud

livelaw.in Law India

Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlights the systemic nature of casteist, ableist, and gendered discrimination in India, emphasizing the need for inclusive representation beyond mere legal interventions.

A Mother Can’t Be Compelled To Choose Between Her Motherhood & Employment, State Can’t Discriminate Against Her 'Right To Dignity' As Mother: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

livelaw.in Law India

The Kerala High Court ruled that a mother cannot be forced to choose between motherhood and employment, emphasizing the fundamental right to dignity as a mother and urging the state to enact legislation protecting employees from family responsibility-based discrimination.

Women Face Intersectional Discrimination At Many Levels, Those Issues Must Be Addressed: Kerala HC On Model Law To Protect Women In Workplace

livelaw.in Law India

The Kerala High Court highlighted the need to address intersectional discrimination against women in a new workplace protection law, prompted by the Hema Committee Report's findings on the Malayalam film industry.

Lawyers call for toll fine overhaul to stop people spiralling into huge debt

theage.com.au Law Australia

Lawyers in Victoria are calling for an overhaul of the toll fine system to prevent people from accumulating massive debts due to late fees and penalties.

​Law of the land: on the judiciary and waqf amendments - The Hindu

thehindu.com Law India

The Supreme Court of India is examining the constitutionality of amendments to the Waqf Act, 2025, which expand government control over waqf properties and raise concerns about religious freedom and the autonomy of the Muslim community.

Forum Shopping Is Abuse Of Legal Process And Cannot Be Condoned: Delhi High Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition due to forum shopping, emphasizing that the dispute should be handled by the appropriate court in Tamil Nadu where the cause of action originated.

Alito Chimes* at Midnight | The New York Sun

nysun.com Law United States

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito dissents against a midnight order halting deportations, citing procedural irregularities and questioning the use of the All Writs Act.

1991 Places of Worship Act: What Supreme Court stopped, why | Explained News - The Indian Express

indianexpress.com Law India

The Indian Supreme Court temporarily halted all new legal challenges to the ownership of religious sites and surveys of disputed places, impacting numerous pending cases questioning the Places of Worship Act of 1991.

Supreme Court Flags Long Submissions In S.34/37 Arbitration Act Proceedings, Says Timelimit Needs To Be Imposed

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India criticized excessively long submissions in arbitration proceedings under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, advocating for time limits to improve efficiency.

Dundee man in court for calling parking warden 'Jackie Chan'

thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

A Dundee man was fined for verbally abusing parking wardens, including a racist remark referencing Jackie Chan.

Ill-informed challenges to Supreme Court decision help nobody

thetimes.com Law UK

The Supreme Court's ruling that 'woman' refers to biological sex in the Equality Act 2010 has sparked debate, with some criticisms based on misunderstandings of the decision.

Mississippi Supreme Court Rules Transitioning Teen Not Entitled to Name Change | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law Mississippi

The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that a minor undergoing gender transition cannot legally change their name to a masculine one, citing state law requiring name changes to be 'clearly in the best interest of the child'.

Una empleada de hogar aprovecha una baja para trabajar en secreto en otra vivienda... y la Justicia le da la razón

elconfidencial.com Law Spain

A Spanish court ruled in favor of a domestic worker who was fired after being caught working elsewhere while on sick leave, highlighting a legal dispute over proper notification of dismissal.

Supreme Court Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett are likely to rescue Obamacare, in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Vox

vox.com Law World

The Supreme Court heard arguments in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, a case challenging the authority of the US Preventive Services Task Force to mandate preventative care coverage under the Affordable Care Act, with Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett seemingly leaning against dismantling the Task Force.

US supreme court hears challenge to Obamacare free preventive healthcare | US supreme court | The Guardian

theguardian.com Law US

The US Supreme Court heard arguments on a case challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's free preventive healthcare services.

Why this police interrogation crossed the line. A collapsed murder case puts Canadian police interview techniques under scrutiny

thestar.com Law Canada

A Canadian murder conviction is overturned due to a flawed police interrogation, prompting scrutiny of interview techniques and highlighting the risks of false confessions.

Barristers disciplined over ‘offensive, demeaning’ LGBTQI ‘joke’ posted in lifts

watoday.com.au Law Australia

Two Australian barristers received reprimands and penalties for posting an offensive LGBTQI joke in their workplace, highlighting issues of professional conduct and inclusivity within the legal profession.

My neighbour's pointed a camera at my garden and is filming my every move... what can I do? DEAN DUNHAM replies | Daily Mail Online

dailymail.co.uk Law UK

A legal expert advises on dealing with a neighbor's CCTV camera pointed at one's garden, and on resolving an insurance claim denial due to faulty guttering.

Guidance for 'sustainable' claims after dismissal of H&M 'greenwashing' class action | Reuters

reuters.com Law World

A federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against H&M for its 'Conscious Choice' line, prompting discussion on the legal implications of 'sustainable' marketing claims and the need for clearer FTC guidelines.

Garda whistleblower sues force over arrest by armed officers during football match with friends – The Irish Times

irishtimes.com Law Ireland

A former Irish police officer is suing the Garda Commissioner, alleging wrongful arrest and retaliation for whistleblowing on defective gun holsters.

High Court fatwa ruling raises alarm over sharia courts in UK

thetimes.com Law UK

A High Court ruling in the UK that incorporated a sharia council's fatwa into a case has sparked concerns among secular campaigners about the influence of religious law in the country's legal system.

С мая Роскомнадзор начнет брать миллионные штрафы. Как убедиться, что вашей компании они не грозят – Главбух № 7, Апрель 2025

e.glavbukh.ru Law Russia

Starting in May, Russia's Roskomnadzor will impose substantial fines for mishandling personal data, with the maximum reaching 500 million rubles, prompting businesses to bolster their data security measures.

I quit as a subcontractor and was told not to contact clients or colleagues. Is this legal? - The Globe and Mail

theglobeandmail.com Law Canada

A former subcontractor seeks legal advice after their former employer prohibits them from contacting clients, colleagues, or speaking negatively about the company.

El juez que investiga al fiscal general cita como testigo a la pareja de Ayuso el 23 de mayo | España | EL PAÍS

elpais.com Law Spain

A Spanish judge investigating the Attorney General has subpoenaed Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner as a witness in a case involving alleged leaks of confidential information.

Caso New Business: Valentín Martínez fue absuelto gracias a la ayuda de Riccardo Francolini | La Prensa Panamá

prensa.com Law Panama

Valentín Martínez, initially convicted of money laundering in the New Business case, was acquitted after a new sworn statement from Riccardo Francolini shifted blame.

Jovem Pan vai pagar R$ 40 mil a Ian Neves por ofensa - 21/03/2025 - Outro Canal - F5

f5.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

A Brazilian court ordered Jovem Pan to pay R$ 40,000 in moral damages to historian Ian Neves for defamatory statements made by commentator Tiago Pavinatto.

Michael Anthony Lunn: Vaucluse students vindicated as teacher found to be paedophile

smh.com.au Law Australia

A former teacher, Michael Anthony Lunn, was found guilty of multiple counts of child sexual assault, vindicating past and present victims who bravely came forward.

‘That ends now’: Judge overseeing Abrego Garcia case knocks Trump administration for repeated stonewalling | CNN Politics

cnn.com Law World

A federal judge criticizes the Trump administration for obstructing the expedited return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador after his wrongful deportation.

Twelve states sue the Trump administration over ‘tax hikes’ through tariffs | CNN Business

cnn.com Law United States

Twelve states are suing the Trump administration, alleging that tariffs imposed via the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) illegally raise taxes on Americans.

CNN Settles Defamation Suit After Being Ordered to Pay $5 Million - The New York Times

nytimes.com Law World

CNN settled a defamation lawsuit after a Florida jury ordered the network to pay $5 million to a security contractor for false accusations made in a 2021 news segment.

Burden Of Proof Lies With Complainant In Consumer Cases: Ernakulam District Commission

livelaw.in Law India

An Indian consumer court ruled that the burden of proof in consumer cases rests with the complainant, dismissing a case due to insufficient evidence.

Should Grounds Of Arrest Be Mandatorily Supplied 'Prior' To Arrest In Every Case? Supreme Court Reserves Orders In Worli Hit & Run Case

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India reserved its judgment on whether providing written grounds for arrest is mandatory before or immediately after arrest in all cases, stemming from a hit-and-run case.

Quasi-Judicial Authority Can’t Pass Non-Speaking Orders: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Punishment Imposed On Constable Allegedly Found Intoxicated On Duty

livelaw.in Law India

The Rajasthan High Court overturned the punishment of a constable found allegedly intoxicated on duty, citing the disciplinary authority's failure to provide sufficient reasoning in their decision.

Primeras condenas a bares de Bilbao por poner la televisión sin pagar derechos | El Correo

elcorreo.com Law Spain

Several Bilbao bars have been ordered to pay for broadcasting television content without proper authorizations, leading to a legal battle between the bars and AISGE, an association of actors and interpreters.

Neue Gesetze im Aargau: Das ändert sich am 1.Januar 2025

aargauerzeitung.ch Law Switzerland

New laws in Aargau, Switzerland, effective January 1, 2025, include tax cuts, increased child allowances, and changes to disability support.

'In India, Every State Action Must Be Fair, Failing Which It Will Fall Foul Of Article 14' : Supreme Court Sets Aside Direction To Shift NH Toll Plaza

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India overturned a Patna High Court ruling that ordered the relocation of a toll plaza on National Highway 30, citing fairness and adherence to Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.

Supreme Court analysis: The most complex, straightforward case of the term.

slate.com Law World

The Supreme Court case, Mahmoud v. Taylor, debates whether parents have a constitutional right to shield their children from LGBTQ+-inclusive books in schools, raising questions about religious freedom, parental rights, and the nature of public education.

Judge Halts Order Demanding Details on Efforts to Return Abrego Garcia to US | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law World

A federal judge temporarily halted her order demanding details from the US government regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a court order preventing his deportation.

Justices Imply Narrow Fuel Maker Win in Auto Emissions Suit (1)

news.bloomberglaw.com Law USA

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case concerning fuel producers' ability to challenge California's stringent auto emission regulations, focusing on whether the producers have standing to sue.

Conclusion: The Future Of Sale Certificate Registration Under SARFAESI

livelaw.in Law India

The Supreme Court of India has definitively ruled on the registration exemption for sale certificates issued under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI).

GST : No Detention Of Goods If There Is Bona Fide Dispute On Tax Rate, Holds Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

livelaw.in Law India

The Kerala High Court ruled that goods cannot be detained under the GST Act if a bona fide dispute exists regarding the tax rate.

S.129 CGST/SGST Act | Penalty Only For Violations With Intent To Evade Tax Or Repeated Violations; Not For Minor Discrepancies : Kerala High Court

livelaw.in Law India

The Kerala High Court ruled that penalties under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act apply only to intentional tax evasion or repeated violations, not minor discrepancies.

Fuerte tirón de orejas de la jueza de la dana a Pradas por desvelar la declaración de Bernabé | Las Provincias

lasprovincias.es Law Spain

A Spanish judge rebukes a former government official for publicly disclosing details of a witness's testimony in an ongoing investigation.

Read the texts Karen Read and John O’Keefe exchanged before his tragic death

bostonglobe.com Law USA

Text messages exchanged between Karen Read and John O'Keefe before his death were presented in court, revealing a strained relationship marked by arguments and disagreements.

Ben Roberts-Smith appeal dealt blow in Federal Court

theage.com.au Law Australia

Ben Roberts-Smith's appeal against a defamation judgment finding him guilty of war crimes in Afghanistan has been dealt a setback in the Federal Court.

New Mexico Supreme Court Bans Former Judge From Exercising Judicial Authority | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law New Mexico

A New Mexico judge resigned after an alleged gang member was arrested at his home, leading the state Supreme Court to ban him from ever holding judicial office again.

Former New Mexico Judge, Wife Arrested Over Alleged Evidence Tampering | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law New Mexico

A former New Mexico judge and his wife were arrested on evidence tampering charges after an alleged gang member was found living in their home.

FBI director says Wisconsin judge arrested for allegedly obstructing ICE | CNN Politics

cnn.com Law USA

A Milwaukee County Circuit judge was arrested by the FBI for allegedly obstructing the arrest of an undocumented immigrant.

Wisconsin judge arrested by FBI, charged with obstructing immigrant arrest - The Washington Post

washingtonpost.com Law USA

A Wisconsin judge was arrested and charged with obstructing an immigration arrest, escalating tensions between the Justice Department and local officials over immigration enforcement.

FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan Over Obstructing, Kash Patel Says | The Epoch Times

theepochtimes.com Law USA

FBI Director Kash Patel announced the arrest of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan on obstruction charges for allegedly aiding an illegal immigrant's escape.

Counsellor in ‘total fear’ of ex-client he entered ‘toxic’ relationship with, court hears – The Irish Times

irishtimes.com Law Ireland

An Irish counsellor obtained a domestic violence protection order against a former client after describing a toxic relationship and ongoing harassment.

Legal Island | Deductions from Pay for Cash/Till Shortages

legal-island.com Law Ireland

This legal advice discusses whether employers can deduct money from employee wages for cash shortages, clarifying that such deductions are generally unlawful unless explicitly agreed upon in writing beforehand.

The clever court ploy that could force Trump’s El Salvador scheme to a head.

slate.com Law World

The ACLU's strategic legal maneuver aims to force a decision on Trump's controversial plan to deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador.

Landowner fails in legal bid against forced sale of St Andrews site

thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

A Scottish court upheld a government decision to force the sale of a St Andrews land plot to a community group for a public garden, rejecting the landowner's claim of unlawful procedures.

Karen Read retrial: Here's how Friday unfolded

bostonglobe.com Law Massachusetts

The Karen Read retrial continued with testimony from a paramedic and a hospital lab director, followed by a jury visit to the crime scene.